Highsmith's claim was dismissed because she had signed away her copyrights, putting the photographs in the public domain. The photograph in question was not an infringement but an original work of authorship of Highsmith.
Alamy stock photo portones license#
According to Alamy’s records your company doesn’t have a valid license for use of the image(s)." and demanded to pay a settlement fee of $120 for the infringement Highsmith was accused of. The e-mail stated "We have seen that an image or image(s) represented by Alamy has been used for online use by your company. License Compliance Services, part of Alamy, had also sent an e-mail to the "This is America!" foundation, a foundation that was founded by Highsmith herself. Highsmith sued Alamy in July 2016 for selling photographs without attribution she had donated to the Library of Congress. Somebody had been fucking with these results and I think I know who! Ĭarol M. As of when this essay was originally written, when you entered "license compliance services sc" into the the searchbox on Google, the only suggestion was "license compliance services science photo library". is Alamy! And these are some real bastards.įun fact: when you enter "license compliance services" in the searchbox on DuckDuckGo the first suggestion is "license compliance services scam". Surprise!! License Compliance Services, Inc. If you own a website, it's possible you receive some threatening junk mail from "License Compliance Services, Inc. That's 1427031 (133%) extra pixels Alamy is pulling out of their ass!ĭid you get some shitty "give us money!" mail from "License Compliance Services"? Alamy claims to offer this image with 1295 × 1929 pixels. is the WikiPedant revision of File:Lynda Carter Wonder Woman.JPG. They also mess with the resolution of images.
Alamy stock photo portones download#
Īlamy charges only 9.99 Euros for personal use and up to 179.99 Euros for a large business! Selling the service to download the image is one thing, but how can Alamy charge large sums of money for selling rights they don't have? It makes no difference if you buy the image for 9.99 or 179.99, the photo is still CC0.